In this exchange between DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Piers Morgan, the CNN host rightfully asks her about the narrative coming out of the Obama administration that the anti-Muhammad video was responsible for the Benghazi attacks. When Morgan tells Schultz that the information "was wrong", Schultz responds with, "well that doesn't mean it was false."
At that point, Morgan has a brief moment of apoplexy.
In the mind of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the following equation is.... well, either wrong or false:
wrong = false
Via Hot Air:
After watching that insanity, take a look at this exchange between House Judiciary Committee member, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) and Attorney General Eric Holder on December 8, 2011. At issue is the Justice Department's then recent withdrawal of a February 4, 2011 letter sent to Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) by Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich. In that letter, Weich asserted that the ATF was not involved in gun-walking.
Just prior to this hearing, the Justice Department rescinded the letter and, in so doing, admitted that the letter was... false?
Uh, not so much. Like Piers Morgan, Gowdy appeared apoplectic when he couldn't get Holder to admit that the letter had been withdrawn because it was "demonstrably false".
No comments:
Post a Comment