Here, you are urged and encouraged to run your mouths about something important.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

VIDEO: GAFFEMASTER BIDEN LOWERS BAR ON HIMSELF

And you didn't think Biden could do worse than telling a man in a wheelchair to stand up. How about, in referring to a man's mother, saying "God rest her soul" when she's still among the living? Hold your breath and wait for MSM to cover it.

Be careful not to turn blue.

VIDEO: BRET BAIER DOES IN 20 MINS WHAT MSM HASN'T DONE IN TWO YEARS

It would not surprise me in the least if Obama and his handlers are regretting the interview with Fox News' Bret Baier, who has always struck me as a serviceable news anchor. No more. After this interview, I have a newfound respect for him. The way he handled Obama in this interview was unmatched. He'd done his homework and was not intimidated by Obama's repeated attempts to limit the number of questions asked by delivering his trademark rambling answers.

One might argue that Bill O'Reilly challenged Obama in that noteworthy interview but what Baier lacked in theatrics he more than made up for in substance. Obama came across as angry and Baier as persistent yet courteous, often getting Obama to appear defensive and obviously uncomfortable answering questions that got to the heart of people's problems with this health care monstrosity. Baier also read from a Fox viewer's email asking why so much arm twisting. Obama's response? He didn't respond to it. Counting all of the questions Obama didn't answer is a tall order. Good luck trying.

Note early on how Obama claims he doesn't pay much attention to the procedural rules in the House or the Senate, that he only cares about voting for health care reform. Sounds to me like Alinsky's "ends justify the means" thinking.

This interview, start to finish, is a MUST SEE.

Part 1



Part 2

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

VIDEO: OBAMA'S GAFFE DOESN'T EVEN FOOL THE AP

You know it's a bad gaffe when even the Associated Press won't take up for Obama. Then again, merely hinting at even remotely offering the slightest degree of tacit support for any position that declares to lower costs by 3000% is untenable. As Rush pointed out on March 16th, lowering expenses by 100% takes it down to $0. How on earth does one account for the remaining 2900%?

Via the AP:
Buyers, beware: President Barack Obama says his health care overhaul will lower premiums by double digits, but check the fine print.

Premiums are likely to keep going up even if the health care bill passes, experts say. If cost controls work as advertised, annual increases would level off with time. But don't look for a rollback. Instead, the main reason premiums would be more affordable is that new government tax credits would help millions of people who can't afford the cost now.
Maybe Obama meant to say premiums will go down by MINUS 3000%. Let's not split hairs.

In any event, watch how clueless the crowd behind Obama is. They actually cheer at having their costs cut by 3000%.

Look, I apologize in advance, but these people are literally morons.



h/t to Gateway Pundit
Accuracy in Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
Big Government
Big Journalism
Breitbart
Doug Ross
Drudge
Flopping Aces
Fox Nation
Fox News
Free Republic
The Hill
Hope for America
Hot Air
Hot Air Pundit
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Jihad Watch
Mediaite
Michelle Malkin
Naked Emperor News
National Review
New Zeal Blog
NewsBusters
Newsmax
News Real
Pajamas Media
Politico
Powerline
Rasmussen
Red State
Right Wing News
Say Anything
Stop Islamization of America
Verum Serum
Wall Street Journal
Washington Times
Watts Up With That
Web Today
Weekly Standard
World Net Daily

Blog Archive