Video: Louis Farrakhan says Fort Hood Shooter not a Terrorist

So Louis Farrakhan is now making the argument that Nidal Malik Hasan, the Fort Hood jihadist who killed 14 and injured 32 on November 9, 2009 was a victim of American terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan. No, really. Farrakhan actually puts forth the notion that as an Army psychiatrist, Hasan had to debrief the 'real terrorists' (American soldiers) after they came back from overseas and confessed to him all of the horrible things they had done. No mention of all the red flags about Hasan before he went on his jihad.

Fast forward to the 2:00 mark if pressed for time.

VIa The Blaze:

Latest Farrakhan / Shabazz Montage: Blame White Man for Bombing of Libya

It is simply amazing how blinded by racism these people are. Nation of Islam Leader Louis Farrakhan, New Black Panther Party Leader Malik Zulu Shabazz, former congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D) and others are more than just a little unhappy with Barack Obama's decision to remove Muammar Gadhafi from power. However, they - especially Farrakhan - don't seem much interested in blaming Obama for it. Apparently, the real problem is that the 'white people' have magically 'turned' Obama into one of them.

Malcolm X was killed by members of the Nation of Islam because after making the pilgrimage to Mecca, he left the Nation of Islam for the Sunni / Muslim Brotherhood brand of Islam. What is so incredibly lost on the likes of Farrakhan and Shabazz is that if anyone has 'turned' Obama, it's been the Muslim Brotherhood. They have significant power throughout our highest levels of government and it is they - aside from RINOs like McCain, Graham, and Pawlenty - who want Farrakhan removed.

If Farrakhan and Shabazz would put down their race-colored glasses, they'd be able to see that most conservatives agree with them, that we should not be in Libya but their blind hatred for the white man simply will not let them see it.

Via The Blaze:

Congressmen Call on Bureau of Prisons to Remove Violent Islamic Texts from Prisons

It's a start and it's logical. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) and Rep. Peter King (R-NY) are calling on the Bureau of Prisons to remove any and all Islamic texts that espouse or condone violence. This includes books, videos, and anything else inmates with nothing but time on their hands could get ahold of that would do nothing more than 'rub raw the sores of their discontent,' to quote from one of Barack Obama's ideological heroes, Saul Alinsky. Quite interestingly, the pair has even singled out Nation of Islam leader, Louis Farrakhan.

Via Daily Caller:

In an attempt to stem the tide of radicalization in American prisons, Tuesday Rep. Frank Wolf and Rep. Peter King called on the U.S. Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to remove “inflammatory written, audio and video materials produced by the ‘Nation of Islam’ and Louis Farrakhan,” and examine all the other Islamic materials circulating in their facilities.

The pair further asked for an audit of the manner in which texts are vetted prior to providing them to inmates.

In a letter to BOP acting director Thomas Kane, Wolf and King, Republicans from Virginia and New York, respectively, cite the June 15, House Homeland Security Committee hearing, led by King, titled “The Threat of Muslim-American Radicalization in U.S. Prisons,” and testimony from former Bureau of Prisons (BOP) director Harley Lappin explaining the susceptibility of convicts to radical propaganda.

“Inmates are particularly vulnerable to recruitment by terrorists,” the letter quotes Lappin. “[BOP] must guard against the spread of terrorism and extremist ideologies.”

Wolf and Kane also pointed to a memo prepared by the House Homeland Security Committee, which highlighted a number of anti-American documents such as “Conspiracy of the US Government” and “Which One Will You Choose: The Flag of Islam or the Flag of America?”

“It defies common sense that any inmate, let alone convicted al Qaeda terrorists, would be able to receive anti-American and anti-Semitic propaganda from the Bureau of Prisons,” said King in the June hearing. “It is imperative that BOP not only remove all materials produced by the ‘Nation of Islam’ and Louis Farrakhan but ensure that all other Islamic texts provided to inmates are vetted.”

This is called 'nibbling around the edges' and it's good to see Republicans starting to address one of the elephants in the living room.

Read it all.

Video: Louis Farrakhan says Obama is a co-opted 'Assassin'

To whet your appetite for this clip, understand that Muammar Gadhafi has been quite the gravy train for Louis Farrakhan over the years. Louis is a big fan and the logic (term used loosely) Farrakhan uses to conclude that Obama has 'become one of them' is based on a completely insane paradigm that says 'wicked Jews' run everything. When you start with that premise, you'll understand that Obama isn't responsible for bombing Libya; it's all those wicked Jews who run the White House that have co-opted Obama's mind, you see.

Perhaps someone should tell Louis to take a look at the Muslim Brotherhood?

Nah, he's on a roll.



h/t Weasel Zippers

Gadhafi's Son is Killed; Lookout for angry videos of Farrakhan and Shabazz

Louis Farrakhan and New Black Panther Party leader Malik Zulu Shabazz were incensed when Obama took the United States into war with Libya. The news that NATO almost killed Gadhafi and DID kill his youngest son and three grandchildren are virtually guaranteed to get the two racist men talking again. The odd thing is that I agree with the stance of both Farrakhan and Shabazz when it comes to staying out of Libya, though for far different reasons. They love Gadhafi; he's been a gravy train for Farrakhan for years. As stated previously, my opposition to the kinetic military action in Libya has to do with the alternative being far worse and the insurmountable debt we're dealing with.

Via Washington Post:

TRIPOLI, Libya — Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi escaped a NATO missile strike in Tripoli on Saturday, but his youngest son and three grandchildren under the age of 12 were killed, a government spokesman said.

The strike, which came hours after Gadhafi called for a cease-fire and negotiations in what rebels called a publicity stunt, marked an escalation of international efforts to prevent the Libyan regime from regaining momentum.

Rebels honked horns and chanted “Allahu Akbar” or “God is great” while speeding through the western city of Misrata, which Gadhafi’s forces have besieged and subjected to random shelling for two months, killing hundreds. Fireworks were set off in front of the central Hikma hospital, causing a brief panic that the light would draw fire from Gadhafi’s forces.

Our defense of rebels with ties to al-Qaeda and who shout "Allahu Akbar" kind of prove my point about the United States doing the wrong thing here.

If going to war against Libya sent Farrakhan and Shabazz into racist rants, surely the death of Gadhafi's son and grandchildren is bound to do the same thing.

Stay tuned....


h/t Drudge

Video: Farrakhan's Back; Money Quotes too Numerous for Headline

This is definitely one of those, 'Where do you even begin' posts. In Farrakhan's latest rant - at Howard University on April 2nd - he reveals he's a 9/11 Truther; he calls Barack Obama a 'Ni***r;' he says Donald Trump is a 'thug;' the Jews control congress; and he defends the Tea Party. In fact, his defense of the Tea Party is so beyond belief that it wouldn't surprise me if his handlers originally had this speech scheduled for April 1st and had to move it because there'd be people in the audience who wouldn't take him seriously on that day.

Wait for the part where he calls Trump a thief because he took Gadhafi's money and gave it to charity. Using Farrakhan's own standard, the U.S. Government is committing theft by taxing its citizens for things they don't want their money going to.

**Content Warning**

Via The Blaze:

Farrakhan Continues Defending Gadhafi, Railing on Obama

If there is anyone the Obama administration has angered most over its attacks on Libya, it's Louis Farrakhan and New Black Panther Party leader Malik Zulu Shabazz. Both see Farrakhan as someone who supports whatever larger agenda they may have. They clearly view Obama's actions there as some sort of betrayal and neither man is happy about it. Farrakhan fired the first salvo on a radio interview last month and is at it again.

Via Chicago Breaking News:

Warning that destruction could be on America's doorstep because it oppresses “God's chosen people,” Minister Louis Farrakhan, the controversial Nation of Islam leader, defended Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi today, calling the U.S. action in Libya hypocrisy.

Speaking from the pulpit of Chicago's Mosque Maryam, the Nation of Islam's international headquarters, purchased 40 years ago with a $3 million loan from Gadhafi, Farrakhan blamed demons for altering President Barack Obama's moral conscience and driving the assault on Gadhafi, who he calls a brother.

An old and reliable adage goes something like this:

Follow the money.

Gadhafi has been a gravy train for Farrakhan for years and the Obama administration dries a little bit more of it up with each missile strike. Interestingly, however, while Farrakhan is angry with Obama, he still finds some way to blame the Jews. It's really quite fascinating:

Farrakhan cautioned Obama that he was being used as a pawn to oppress his own people in Africa. He insisted several times that Jews controlled the media and pressured Obama to take so-called humanitarian action in Libya, but not in other places such as the Gaza Strip.

“The stupid mistake we make is assuming the president is the supreme power,” Farrakhan said. “The mad dogs are growling and grinding in Washington, D.C.,” referring to one of Gadhafi's nicknames, “Mad Dog of the Middle East.”

This is what we call a flawed paradigm boys and girls. The notion that Obama is being controlled by the Jews is one for the ages. Lost on Farrakhan is that if anyone has influence on Obama, it's the Muslim Brotherhood, which is greatly supporting the rebels. The truth is that Farrakhan and Shabazz have a dream for Africa that includes Gadhafi's continued support. By removing Gadhafi from power, Barack Obama - via the Jews of course - will be responsible for shattering that dream.

h/t Fox Nation

Video: New Black Panther Party Leader Echoes Farrakhan's anti-Obama Sentiment, Uses 'N' Word Repeatedly

This is no way to pay back the Obama Administration for dismissing the 2008 voter intimidation charges. The leader of the New Black Panther Party (NBPP), Malik Zulu Shabazz has now officially joined the likes of Louis Farrakhan, who railed on the Obama administration for opposing Gadhafi. Last week, Farrakhan rhetorically asked Obama, 'who the hell do you think you are?'

Now Shabazz has been caught going on an 'N' word / 'Uncle Tom' rant against the administration. Via The Blaze:



To watch Farrakhan's recent rants against Obama, click HERE.

Video: Louis Farrakhan says Obama is 'Jewish'

It appears that Louis Farrakhan is still quite angry at Barack Obama over how the United States is treating Louie's buddy Gadhafi, who has provided the Nation of Islam leader with millions of dollars over the years. If Gadhafi goes away, so does Farrakhan's gravy train. While speaking on March 25th, Farrakhan took umbrage at being 'tricked' with respect to how Obama is governing. Whatever agenda Farrakhan has - likely some sort of United States of African Muslim nations - removing Gadhafi is antithetical to that agenda and he's not happy about it at all.

There are many parts in this video that induce head-scratching. One of them comes early on when Louie justifies dictators by comparing them to parents of children who make all the rules. He also drops an 'N' bomb in referring to a black mayor but Obama's policies have apparently so flummoxed Farrakhan that the only answer he can come up for those policies is that Obama must be 'Jewish.'

Who knew?!

Via The Blaze:



Watch the radio rant Farrakhan went on during an interview on WVON in Chicago.

Video: Obama Uncomfortable when Questioned about Libya

In an interview with Philadelphia ABC television affiliate reporter Jim Gardner, Barack Obama refused to answer questions about his policy on Libya. Obama's reaction to the question, however, did speak volumes. His eyes appeared to be communicating the message, 'How dare you ask me that.' Gardner wanted Obama to clear up the ambiguity in messaging that saw Secretary of State Clinton demand that Kadhafi leave and Obama's softer assertion that the Libyan leader stop killing.

When the Louis Farrakhan angle is factored into this equation, Obama's irritation makes a bit more sense. Farrakhan and Gadhafi are very tight and have shared similar goals. Farrakhan has also received millions of dollars from Gadhafi over the years.

Obama can no longer vote 'present.' Any U.S. attack on Libya is Obama's call.



Gardner's BIO.

h/t Jawa Report

Video: Farrakhan Rails on Obama over Libya Policy

While appearing as an in-studio guest on WVON radio in Chicago, Louis Farrakhan went on a ten minute rant against Obama over the president's policy with Libya. Farrakhan is visibly angry that Obama is deciding to take military action to have Gaddafi removed from power. He also blames the CIA for fomenting dissent in foreign nations like Iran so America can go in and better oust dictatorial leaders. He references the uprising in Iran as if to say we were responsible for them.

The Libya problem is one of Obama's more complicated ones, especially in light of his relationship with Jeremiah Wright and Farrakhan. Farrakhan has a very strong personal relationship with Gaddafi.

Via WND:

Farrakhan, a close friend and associate of Wright, has been financed by Gadhafi, including with a $5 million interest-free loan in 1985.

Later that year, Gadhafi spoke by satellite to Farrakhan's Saviour's Day Convention in Chicago, and reportedly told Farrakhan supporters he was prepared to provide weapons to a black army in the U.S. to destroy "white America."

In October 1995, Gadhafi reportedly called Farrakhan with congratulations on the success of the Million Man March. Gadhafi was said to have assured Farrakhan that together "we will unite our capabilities and efforts to achieve this."

Farrakhan obviously feels that Obama is harming whatever cause exists between the Nation of Islam and Gaddafi. One thing we've learned about Obama is he's more interested in picking winners and losers than he is in loyalty. The uprising in Libya is being fed by the Muslim Brotherhood and in the bigger scheme of things, they are much more powerful than one country at this point.

Farrakhan gets quite fiery here. Wait for the part where he says to Obama, 'Who the Hell do you think you are?'



h/t Freedom's Lighthouse