WOW! SAUL ALINSKY MAKES NEA RECOMMENDED READING LIST

The National Education Association has demonstrated that it can actually lower the bar for itself by recommending two books written by the founder of Community Organizing and inspiration for Barack Obama's career in Community Organizing, Saul Alinsky. It doesn't get anymore despicable than this. Then again, if this doesn't sufficiently anger American people who have a problem with radicals overthrowing America's Constitutional government.

This may just be worse than getting school children to sing songs praising Barack Obama. Thanks to DOUG ROSS for uncovering this one. Straight from the NEA website.

An inspiration to anyone contemplating action in their community! And to every organizer!

Saul Alinsky wrote the book on American radicalism - two books, in fact: a 1945 best-seller, "Reveille for Radicals" and "Rules for Radicals" in 1971. The "Reveille" title page quotes Thomas Paine... "Let them call me rebel and welcome, I feel no concern from it; but I should suffer the misery of devils, were I to make a whore of my soul."

Think about this one. Taxpayer dollars are going toward the effort of elevating books by a man who not only dedicated one of those books to Lucifer but called for the overthrow of the United States government. Americans are subsidizing propaganda and tactics designed to destroy their own country.

Nothing to see here. Just be sure to get that #4 with a diet coke at lunchtime.

h/t to DOUG ROSS

VIDEO: LEG THRILL COMMENT GRATES ON MATTHEWS

This is great. While Chris "Thrill up my leg" Matthews is badgering a guest about his knowledge of Republican leadership, the guest plucks the nerve that gave Matthews that original leg thrill. Take note of Matthews' response. It is truly priceless.

The look on his face says everying despite the fact that he tries to play it off like he doesn't know what his guest is talking about. Then note how the guest begins laughing because he knows he's turned the tables instantly.



h/t NB

VIDEO: NEWT LICKS WOUNDS ON BACKING SCOZZAFAVA

While Newt says he doesn't blame conservatives for being angry, he seems to fall short of actually accepting responsibility. Instead, he looks to the local Republican leadership while implying they weren't watched closely enough.

When it comes to picking a side in a debate and phrasing the terms of an argument to best make one's point, they don't come much better than Gingrich so his verbiage may satiate some but I'd personally like to have seen him just say five words and move on.

Those words? "I'm sorry. I was wrong."



h/t to GP