Here, you are urged and encouraged to run your mouths about something important.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Video: TSA Mistreats Special Needs Man on his Way to Disney

Please remember as you watch the latest in an increasingly long line of examples of despicable TSA behavior, that Barack Obama could end all of this today. When you see these stories, they are 100% on his authority. He could stop this today if he wanted to. The TSA reports directly to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and Napolitano reports directly to Obama. Ok, now the latest example. Drew Mandy is 29 years old but he has the mental capacity of a two-year old. As he was going through security at an airport on his way to Disney World with his parents, he was stopped for carrying a plastic toy hammer and a baseball.

Just watch what happened.

From Fox 2 in Detroit affiliate via Hapblog:

MSNBC: Bill Clinton Furious Weiner won't Resign

The president who was impeached for lying under oath and who refused to resign, is apparently furious that Anthony Weiner won't resign for very similar reasons (minus the under oath part). Why wouldn't Bill sit this one out? While it's true that the longer Weiner remains in his job, the more damage will be done to the Party, is there another reason for this outrage from Bill? Does he have something more at stake? If not, why would he go down this hypocritically ironic road?

Via MSNBC's First Read:
While embattled Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner seems intent about staying in his job -- and he’s been bolstered by a poll showing that a majority of his constituents say he shouldn’t resign -- we can report that Democratic leaders, including former President Bill Clinton, are frustrated and some even furious at him. The reason: He isn’t doing his party any favors by staying in his job. The VERY few folks advising him to stay are the only folks he is listening to. Monday will be intense for him ,because the House is back and the Democratic caucus may speak as a group. By the way, even Mark Foley is saying he should resign.
Is there something beyond a concern for the well-being of the Democrat Party that would cause Clinton to get in the middle of this? Possibly. Consider Weiner's wife - Huma Abedin; she is Hillary's closest adviser and has been for years. Is there something about her the Clintons don't want to come out? Huma is very much a behind-the-scenes kind of adviser but this scandal is causing people to take notice of her. The longer Weiner remains in congress, the more that curiosity is likely to rise.

h/t Fox Nation

What Bill Clinton has in Common with Judas Iscariot (It's not what you think)

Rush Limbaugh talked about the book Reckless Endangerment: How outsized Ambition, Greed, and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon on his June 10th program. If you missed it, the transcript is a must-read. He talks of his suspicions because the main author is a business writer for the New York Times but apparently it's a bombshell and not only documents the origins of the financial crisis we're in. The apparently lead to not just the Democrat Party but to Bill Clinton personally.

Via Rush Limbaugh: is a credible indictment of the Democrat Party, Democrat leaders and the Democrat Party's alliance with Wall Street leaders in creating -- by virtue of policy -- the entire crisis that has led to the present state of the economy, that it can be laid at the feet of Democrats exclusively. Now, in terms of its origins -- origins, by the way, which go back to 1992 and Bill Clinton. Now, in the ensuing years, there have been Republicans that have come along and have allowed such things as subprime crisis and all to go on. There were other Republicans that tried to regulate against it and stop it. So it's not entirely laid at the feet of Democrats, but its origins are. It's a devastating book. I've now started hunting and pecking my way through it.
Then he says this:
This traces the current crisis all the way back to Bill Clinton personally, not some members of his administration (although they are included) but him personally. The first words in the book are a quote from Bill Clinton about the need for home ownership to be spread far and wide, that it would rebound the economy, that it would give a greater sense of community. But whether people can afford homes or not, they need to be in them. It details and explains the subprime crisis, how it came about, what it is and how people made money from it. It explains the derivatives. It explains the packaging (or the pooling, if you will) of mortgages. It traces the first such evidence of this in the private sector. Now, Fannie Mae is target number one along with Clinton and the Democrats. Barney Frank, Chris Dodd.
Ok, so the subprime mortgage crisis originates with Bill Clinton. Rush then asks the obvious question:
So you make a bunch of loans to people that can't pay them back, you know that going in, and how in the world do you make money? You lie to other people. You pool those subprime mortgages into what's called a security. You put 130 million mortgages together, $130 million worth of mortgages together in a pool in the security -- you pool them -- and you sell that to an investor on the basis that the income stream from all of those mortgages in one security is going to be a goldmine. The income stream being people making their monthly payments. You fudge all that. You're not truthful about who is in this pool and how unlikely they are to pay, but you sell this great future revenue stream on the come. Investors go out and buy it, and at each stage investors learn they bought a bill of goods.
This last part has a strong Biblical corollary. Check out what Rush says:
The plan, former Fannie executives say, was to commit so much money to 'low-income housing for families and communities most in need,' that no one would dare criticize the other activities Fannie Mae engages in."

So you go out of your way to make it possible for the poor to get into homes and whatever else you do is ignored because you're doing the Lord's work.

Social justice.
In light of that premise, check out John 12: 3-6:
3 Then Mary took a pound of very costly oil of spikenard, anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped His feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the oil.
4 But one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, who would betray Him, said, 5 “Why was this fragrant oil not sold for three hundred denarii[b] and given to the poor?” 6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief, and had the money box; and he used to take what was put in it.
Perhaps we have another reason why Democrats don't like Christians. Bill Clinton was operating from Judas Iscariot's playbook.

Read it all.
Accuracy in Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
Big Government
Big Journalism
Doug Ross
Flopping Aces
Fox Nation
Fox News
Free Republic
The Hill
Hope for America
Hot Air
Hot Air Pundit
Jawa Report
Jihad Watch
Michelle Malkin
Naked Emperor News
National Review
New Zeal Blog
News Real
Pajamas Media
Red State
Right Wing News
Say Anything
Stop Islamization of America
Verum Serum
Wall Street Journal
Washington Times
Watts Up With That
Web Today
Weekly Standard
World Net Daily

Blog Archive