Verum Serum does it again. This time all of those clips of Obama and company, in their moments of truth, when they're not afraid to say what they really mean, are put together in a brady bunch montage for your viewing.
The only thing missing is the music but you get the idea.
h/t to VS
Here, you are urged and encouraged to run your mouths about something important.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
WORSE THAN PARENTS OF SUICIDE BOMBERS
Have you ever asked yourself how despicable it must be for the parents of suicide bombers to groom their children to strap bombs to their chest to kill themselves and others in the name of religion? Well it appears that the religion of vanity and secular humanism may be worse.
Imagine a company that uses the fetal tissue of aborted babies in its anti-aging cream products. Welcome to the consequences of Roe v. Wade - the most despicable consequences, actually. CHRISTIAN NEWS WIRE reports:
h/t to GP
Imagine a company that uses the fetal tissue of aborted babies in its anti-aging cream products. Welcome to the consequences of Roe v. Wade - the most despicable consequences, actually. CHRISTIAN NEWS WIRE reports:
TENNESSEE, Oct. 27 /Christian Newswire/ -- Children of God for Life announced today that Neocutis, a bio-pharmaceutical company focused on dermatology and skin care is using aborted fetal cell lines to produce several of their anti-aging skin creams.Anyone remember Al Pacino's line in Devil's Advocate?
"It is absolutely deplorable that Neocutis would resort to exploiting the remains of a deliberately slaughtered baby for nothing other than pure vanity and financial gain," stated Executive Director Debi Vinnedge. "There is simply no moral justification for this."
h/t to GP
Labels:
Abortion,
Al Pacino,
Devil's Advocate,
Neocutis
SPEAKING OF ALL THOSE MAO CONNECTIONS
It may well be time to revisit this one.
Considering all of the radicals Obama has surrounded himself with consist of people who revere Mao Tse Tung, Larry Grathwohl’s words from 1982 are carrying added significance.
As an informant for the FBI into Weather Underground, Grathwohl tells of their plans. Two minutes long. Parts of it seem outlandish but they seemed much more outlandish one year ago. That fact alone warrants another look.
This next part about a shared address between Ayers, Obama, and a Chinese Maoist courtesy of VERUM SERUM from last year.
In addition to Obama sharing a business address with Ayers and a Chinese Maoist for 3 years in the 1990’s (95-98), Ayers got the title of his book, “Prairie Fire” from a Mao quote.
"A Single Spark Can Start a Prairie Fire"
- Mao Tse Tung
The address Obama shared with Ayers and Klonsky (Maoist) from 1995-1998 is:
115 South Sangamon Street (pictured)
3rd Floor
Chicago, IL 60607
Note the letters in the windows of the 3rd floor. They spell H-O-P-E. The Verum Serum link above provides further proof.
This is getting very important. It would seem to be the time for O'Reilly, Hannity, or Beck to pick up on it.
Considering all of the radicals Obama has surrounded himself with consist of people who revere Mao Tse Tung, Larry Grathwohl’s words from 1982 are carrying added significance.
As an informant for the FBI into Weather Underground, Grathwohl tells of their plans. Two minutes long. Parts of it seem outlandish but they seemed much more outlandish one year ago. That fact alone warrants another look.
This next part about a shared address between Ayers, Obama, and a Chinese Maoist courtesy of VERUM SERUM from last year.
In addition to Obama sharing a business address with Ayers and a Chinese Maoist for 3 years in the 1990’s (95-98), Ayers got the title of his book, “Prairie Fire” from a Mao quote.
"A Single Spark Can Start a Prairie Fire"
- Mao Tse Tung
The address Obama shared with Ayers and Klonsky (Maoist) from 1995-1998 is:
115 South Sangamon Street (pictured)
3rd Floor
Chicago, IL 60607
Note the letters in the windows of the 3rd floor. They spell H-O-P-E. The Verum Serum link above provides further proof.
This is getting very important. It would seem to be the time for O'Reilly, Hannity, or Beck to pick up on it.
UPDATE: VIDEO: DEM REP IMPLIES OBAMA LIED
UPDATED ON 10/29: Original post from 10/28 below the dotted line. Yesterday (28th) we learned that a Democrat Representative from Michigan found it unacceptable to have taxpayer funded abortions as part of any healthcare bill. He even seemed to feign indignation over the president's inconsistencies and semantics on the matter.
Now video of Stupak on Saturday, October 24th at a town hall has surfaced. At that town hall, he says that if the bill has everything he wants except the provision that prohibits taxpayer-funded abortions, he would still vote for the bill. At worst, these two positions are hypocritical and Stupak is doing the same thing he accused Obama of doing. At best, the reaction he got from those in attendance at his town hall caused him to change his position days later.
Either way, Stupak appears to be posturing and constituent heat on the issue of abortion is exposing some inconsistency on his part.
h/t to H4A
-----------------
When Joe Wilson shouted, "You Lie" at Obama during the Joint Session of congress in September, no one realized how right he was. In addition to the statement Wilson responded to, there appears to be another one that seems to validate the same charge.
The claim made by Obama at that session in which he said "our plan" would not use taxpayer dollars to fund abortion appears to be a bald-faced lie as well. Representative Bart Stupak (D-MI) in this video explains why. Stupak does not want taxpayer dollars to fund abortion. HR 3200, the only plan available at the time Obama gave the joint session speech, consists of language that would allow taxpayer dollars to fund abortion is not going to be changed according to Stupak.
According to Stupak, Pelosi will hear no amendment calling for that change while Obama told him (Stupak) that he supports such an amendment. Uh, if Pelosi asks, "how high" when Obama tells her to jump, why is she so insistent that taxpayer dollars fund abortions?
Joe Wilson was right and probably could have shouted throughout the entire speech.
For greater detail, CNSNEWS has it.
h/t to VS
Now video of Stupak on Saturday, October 24th at a town hall has surfaced. At that town hall, he says that if the bill has everything he wants except the provision that prohibits taxpayer-funded abortions, he would still vote for the bill. At worst, these two positions are hypocritical and Stupak is doing the same thing he accused Obama of doing. At best, the reaction he got from those in attendance at his town hall caused him to change his position days later.
Either way, Stupak appears to be posturing and constituent heat on the issue of abortion is exposing some inconsistency on his part.
h/t to H4A
-----------------
When Joe Wilson shouted, "You Lie" at Obama during the Joint Session of congress in September, no one realized how right he was. In addition to the statement Wilson responded to, there appears to be another one that seems to validate the same charge.
The claim made by Obama at that session in which he said "our plan" would not use taxpayer dollars to fund abortion appears to be a bald-faced lie as well. Representative Bart Stupak (D-MI) in this video explains why. Stupak does not want taxpayer dollars to fund abortion. HR 3200, the only plan available at the time Obama gave the joint session speech, consists of language that would allow taxpayer dollars to fund abortion is not going to be changed according to Stupak.
According to Stupak, Pelosi will hear no amendment calling for that change while Obama told him (Stupak) that he supports such an amendment. Uh, if Pelosi asks, "how high" when Obama tells her to jump, why is she so insistent that taxpayer dollars fund abortions?
Joe Wilson was right and probably could have shouted throughout the entire speech.
For greater detail, CNSNEWS has it.
h/t to VS
Labels:
Abortion,
Barack Obama,
Bart Stupak,
Health Care,
Joe Wilson
VIDEO: VALERIE JARRETT DOES THE MOONWALK
Yes, Campbell Brown gets Valerie Jarrett to step out of her chair and do that funky backward dance. Well, not exactly but she does walk back very quickly when Campbell Brown asks Jarrett if MSNBC is biased after getting Jarrett to admit that Fox is biased. In fact, it may just be the walk back of the year.
What on earth would cause CNN to entrap the other half of Obama's brain? We could be witnessing the beginnning of an internal battle between the leftwing media. Pride is a very powerful thing and CNN's ratings are cratering. In fact, as their promos tout them being the most watched cable news network, they're actually in the basement looking up at, of all things, their sister network Headline News which airs re-runs all day.
Meanwhile, Keith Olbermann at MSNBC is airing promos saying that because Fox is no longer a news outlet, the race for #1 is among all of the remaining networks. During and after the promo, Olbermann gloats about how CNN and Headline news are being left in MSNBC's dust.
My guess is CNN doesn't like this one bit and it was manifested in this interview of Jarrett by Campbell Brown, who deserves high marks for the questioning.
Something else caught my eye too. We all know how much the left detests Sarah Palin. Putting Valerie Jarrett in that camp is a very safe bet.
Is it me or has Valerie Jarrett decided that she likes the eyeglass frames that Palin wears?
CLICK HERE to watch video.
h/t to H4A
What on earth would cause CNN to entrap the other half of Obama's brain? We could be witnessing the beginnning of an internal battle between the leftwing media. Pride is a very powerful thing and CNN's ratings are cratering. In fact, as their promos tout them being the most watched cable news network, they're actually in the basement looking up at, of all things, their sister network Headline News which airs re-runs all day.
Meanwhile, Keith Olbermann at MSNBC is airing promos saying that because Fox is no longer a news outlet, the race for #1 is among all of the remaining networks. During and after the promo, Olbermann gloats about how CNN and Headline news are being left in MSNBC's dust.
My guess is CNN doesn't like this one bit and it was manifested in this interview of Jarrett by Campbell Brown, who deserves high marks for the questioning.
Something else caught my eye too. We all know how much the left detests Sarah Palin. Putting Valerie Jarrett in that camp is a very safe bet.
Is it me or has Valerie Jarrett decided that she likes the eyeglass frames that Palin wears?
CLICK HERE to watch video.
h/t to H4A
Labels:
Campbell Brown,
CNN,
Fox News Channel,
MSNBC,
Valerie Jarrett
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Accuracy in Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
Big Government
Big Journalism
Breitbart
Doug Ross
Drudge
Flopping Aces
Fox Nation
Fox News
Free Republic
The Hill
Hope for America
Hot Air
Hot Air Pundit
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Jihad Watch
Mediaite
Michelle Malkin
Naked Emperor News
National Review
New Zeal Blog
NewsBusters
Newsmax
News Real
Pajamas Media
Politico
Powerline
Rasmussen
Red State
Right Wing News
Say Anything
Stop Islamization of America
Verum Serum
Wall Street Journal
Washington Times
Watts Up With That
Web Today
Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
American Spectator
American Thinker
Big Government
Big Journalism
Breitbart
Doug Ross
Drudge
Flopping Aces
Fox Nation
Fox News
Free Republic
The Hill
Hope for America
Hot Air
Hot Air Pundit
Instapundit
Jawa Report
Jihad Watch
Mediaite
Michelle Malkin
Naked Emperor News
National Review
New Zeal Blog
NewsBusters
Newsmax
News Real
Pajamas Media
Politico
Powerline
Rasmussen
Red State
Right Wing News
Say Anything
Stop Islamization of America
Verum Serum
Wall Street Journal
Washington Times
Watts Up With That
Web Today
Weekly Standard
World Net Daily
Blog Archive
- ► 2012 (901)
- ► 2011 (1224)
- ► 2010 (1087)