The TELEGRAPH reported: Following the ‘climategate scandal’, Mr Blair said the science may not be “as certain as its proponents allege”.By calibrating his position like this, Blair is exposing himself as someone willing to perpetuate an agenda based on an unproven set of premises and he is apparently willing to do it at the peril of his own country, which is a developed nation that would have to cut back on its emissions in order to help poorer nations.
But he said the world should act as a precaution against floods, droughts and mass extinction caused by climate change, in fact it would be “grossly irresponsible” not to.
What does this reality say about Blair? Does it say he's willing to sell out his country? If he truly believed the world was in trouble as a direct result of man-made global warming and was willing to lead his nation in the "sacrifice" of cutting back on emissions, wouldn't he be using the occasion of climategate to get angry at those who have been perpetuating the fraudulent science?
Instead, he is still siding with them and in doing so, is aligning with a global organization (UN) against his own country. By taking this position on climategate, Blair has portrayed himself in a potentially treasonous light. Blair is quoted as saying:
“It is said that the science around climate change is not as certain as its proponents allege. It doesn’t need to be. What is beyond debate, however, is that there is a huge amount of scientific support for the view that the climate is changing and as a result of human activity.”Based on what? Where is this "huge amount of scientific support"? If Blair wasn't part of this fraud, wouldn't he be outraged at its being exposed?
Despicable, Tony Blair. Despicable.
No comments:
Post a Comment