Here is the original logo:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67330/673308dee5f13d698e2c7f4df305d263b4962368" alt=""
Here is the new logo:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/324b8/324b8d7ac72ebd5658bcabcd78a633d99dcccd5c" alt=""
I noticed this story first on Hot Air Pundit which posted via Weazlezippers. Now the Washington Times has picked it up.
While the Times doesn't compare the new logo to the Islamic Crescent, it does call out the D.O.D. on the logo's likeness to the 2008 Obama campaign logo:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a01f0/a01f00bf38f37be17e5b84a0b9bf0a0784a95333" alt=""
Now, how about that Islamic Crescent? There are many variations but to dismiss similarities out of hand would seem a bit premature. Note that the Islamic symbol, like the Missile Defense logo, has a star at two o'clock. The only difference between the two is that the crescent moon is inverted. I have a difficult time believing there isn't something to this.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73a98/73a982e5fea56127fe11450fb08709a4004e215b" alt=""
For some reason, this all reminded me of the controversy surrounding the United 93 Memorial, which is set to open on 9/11/11. Many wrote about it, including Michelle Malkin back in 2005.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36eab/36eab2712a077f0da2a258b11466b42e644739e5" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment