Here, you are urged and encouraged to run your mouths about something important.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010


Ok, call it another credibility test for the un-named 'White House Insider' (WHI) who's been talking to an anonymous blogger named Ulsterman since early September. He rightfully predicted the departure of Larry Summers hours before it was announced but the further removed this person is from the White House - since departing - has apparently caused Ulsterman to want a boost in the credibility of his source via another prediction.

WHI does, in fact, make that prediction in the latest interview from Ulsterman. I'll let you read it for yourself to find out who it is but the revelation does indeed come at the end. Here's another hint. If WHI is correct, the likely replacement of the individual will be far worse - as bad as that will be to comprehend - than the person currently occupying that role.

Other things discussed in the latest interview include Barack Obama's birthplace, which is NOT the percolating scandal that WHI has been talking about. WHI also gives a few clues as to where the alleged scandal will bust open. Here is the relevant excerpt:
Read the (New York?) Times. Somebody there has sniffed it out. And a guy over at the (Washington?) Post. If the Post starts to get on it, the Times will probably go ahead and break it open, loyalty to the White House be damned. I told you before, parts of the story have already been given out publicly here and there. One part will lead to another and then another. It’s underway right now. Every week a little bit more shows itself.
What scandal is out there that has been percolating for some time? The most obvious example is the New Black Panther Party (NBPP) case. In fact, Charlie Savage at the New York Times reported on it in July and the Washington Post reported on it just last month.

He says if the (Washington) Post reports on it further than it has, the New York Times may just blow it wide open. Considering the recent developments in this case - Thomas Perez likely caught lying under oath, courtesy of recently acquired emails - it would seem the most likely prospect.

If WHI is the real thing, his / her agenda is taking shape and it involves getting solidly behind a Hillary Clinton presidential nomination in 2012. Another prediction he / she makes is Hillary announcing her intention to run this spring. In fact, if Hillary wasn't planning on doing so then, it might benefit her to do as WHI suggests, even if he / she is not a credible source; it will only fuel any existent White House paranoia that does exist.

If you'd like to read Part one first, CLICK HERE.

Here is an excerpt via NewsFlavor:
Ulsterman: Ok – so you still think Hillary Clinton is thinking of running for President in 2012?

Insider: Yes.

Ulsterman: What will be the biggest factor in her final decision?

Insider: The economy. If it does not improve she is in. She will run.

Ulsterman: How long before that decision is made by her?

Insider: By spring – a few more months or so. But she won’t be the first to jump in against Obama. Word is there will be a break the ice candidate.

Ulsterman: Break the ice candidate? What is that?

Insider: Someone will step in to challenge Obama – break the ice. That will allow Hillary to come in after and not be the party crasher so to speak. The first candidate comes in and creates the chaos – she follows after to calm it all down and play up her experience. She is saving the party and saving the country. If Hillary gets into the race for president, some version of that process is how it will go down.

Ulsterman: You know this? How?

Insider: There is no real “know” in politics. Things are changing – but Hillary wants in. She wants to be president. So, now they just have to wait and plan for the right opportunity. That opportunity may come, and it may not. They are looking at deciding by spring though, that much I do know. For instance, if the scandal breaks – that would give her a prime opportunity to step in now wouldn’t it?

Ulsterman: Yes, I guess it would. If Hillary Clinton were to seek the presidency, would you support her?

Insider: Absolutely – I have said that to you already. Yes, I would absolutely support her. And I would gladly be a part of her campaign. Hey Hillary – call me! (laughs)
Read it all. You won't be disappointed.

No comments:

Accuracy in Media
American Spectator
American Thinker
Big Government
Big Journalism
Doug Ross
Flopping Aces
Fox Nation
Fox News
Free Republic
The Hill
Hope for America
Hot Air
Hot Air Pundit
Jawa Report
Jihad Watch
Michelle Malkin
Naked Emperor News
National Review
New Zeal Blog
News Real
Pajamas Media
Red State
Right Wing News
Say Anything
Stop Islamization of America
Verum Serum
Wall Street Journal
Washington Times
Watts Up With That
Web Today
Weekly Standard
World Net Daily

Blog Archive