SPEAKING OF ALL THOSE MAO CONNECTIONS

It may well be time to revisit this one.

Considering all of the radicals Obama has surrounded himself with consist of people who revere Mao Tse Tung, Larry Grathwohl’s words from 1982 are carrying added significance.

As an informant for the FBI into Weather Underground, Grathwohl tells of their plans. Two minutes long. Parts of it seem outlandish but they seemed much more outlandish one year ago. That fact alone warrants another look.



This next part about a shared address between Ayers, Obama, and a Chinese Maoist courtesy of VERUM SERUM from last year.

In addition to Obama sharing a business address with Ayers and a Chinese Maoist for 3 years in the 1990’s (95-98), Ayers got the title of his book, “Prairie Fire” from a Mao quote.

"A Single Spark Can Start a Prairie Fire"
- Mao Tse Tung

The address Obama shared with Ayers and Klonsky (Maoist) from 1995-1998 is:

115 South Sangamon Street (pictured)
3rd Floor
Chicago, IL 60607

Note the letters in the windows of the 3rd floor. They spell H-O-P-E. The Verum Serum link above provides further proof.

This is getting very important. It would seem to be the time for O'Reilly, Hannity, or Beck to pick up on it.

PRAVDA COMPARES OBAMA TO HITLER

In addition to having the strong opinion that Obama never should have received the Nobel Peace Prize, the Pravda columnist correctly points out that while Josef Stalin and Benito Mussolini didn't win the prize, both were nominated. How anyone can take the prize seriously, regardless, is beyond me.

Almost as laughable is the fact that one of the actual three prizes Obama will receive includes a prize for his handling of economics.

Obama is scheduled to receive three Nobel Prizes, two for Peace and one for Economics. His second prize will be in Economics, while third in Peace. After receiving his prizes, Obama will be the only man in human history to receive three unshared Nobel Prizes.

As for the Hitler comparisons, some are irrefutable, others intriguing, and a couple merely coincidental reaches. Nonetheless, check out what PRAVDA has to say about them:

Both Obama and Hitler share similar ancestries: Obama German, Hitler Austrian.

Both leaders had been surrounded by many controversies concerning birth certificate, citizenship and religion.

Both had the father figure issues. Obama’s parents separated when he was two years old and they divorced in 1964. His father returned to Kenya and saw him only once more before dying in an automobile accident in 1982. Hitler had a troubled relationship with his tradition-minded authoritarian father, who frequently beat him.

During their teenage years both leaders had problems with alcohol. Obama called the alcohol phase "greatest moral failure", Hitler called it “most humiliated experience in life”.

Both are unloved by the Jewish, for Hitler is well known why, for Obama, well, his victory in Presidential elections was not received with welcome in Israel.

Time magazine named Obama person of the year in 2008, Hitler in 1938.

Both had bestseller books: Obama had “Dreams of my Father” (memoir) and “the Audacity of Hope” (political convictions), Hitler had “Mein Kampf (My Struggle) in Volumes 1 and 2. It combines elements of autobiography with an exposition of Hitler's political ideology.

Obama was influenced by Martin Luther King, Hitler by Martin Luther.

Both Obama and Hitler came to power during the recession-depression; Obama in 2009, Hitler in 1933.

Both are personality cult leaders, portrayed as saviors of political and economical depression; Obama as an American savior, Hitler as German. A cult of personality arises when a country's leader uses mass media to create an idealized and heroic public image, often through unquestioning flattery and praise.

Both are/were very gifted orators, having ability to attract great interest in their speeches. Both have/had hand gestures when giving a speech.

Both leaders had initiated health reforms, environmentalism and animal protection rights, among others.

As for the enviornmentalism and animal protection rights, think Al Gore, Climate Czar Carol Browner, and Cass Sunstein, regulatory czar who wants animals to have attorneys.

One additional element to all of this may be Obama's affinity for people who revere Mao Tse Tung (or at least show appreciation for the 20th century's greatest mass murderer). First, we had White House Communications Director ANITA DUNN, then it was Manufacturing czar, RON BLOOM, and then let's not forget that Mr. Obama shared a business address with MIKE KLONSKY in the 1990's (along with Bill Ayers).

VIDEO: BECK IS POUNDING THE WHITE HOUSE

This is shaping up to be quite the Rocky v. Apollo Creed story. Beck is making Apollo look foolish. Creed thought this would be easy! First up, take note of Brit Hume talking about the White House war on Fox. Stay with it all the way to the end when he makes reference to Beck's red phone and the guy sitting next to it being dressed in a "Mao suit" in order to help Anita Dunn feel more comfortable calling in.

Beck is thoroughly punking the White House, which is getting increasingly desperate.

CLICK HERE to watch Hume.

If you'd like to see the guy dressed in the "Mao suit" Hume referred to, CLICK HERE

h/t to H4A

VIDEO: ANITA DUNN TALKS ABOUT CONTROLLING MEDIA

It appears more video of the White House communications director who turns to Mao Tse Tung for philosophical guidance, Anita Dunn has surfaced. Here she is from January, 2009 talking about how the Obama campaign wanted to "(make) the media cover what Obama was actually saying" and "making the press cover what we were saying".

Also take note of her reference to the David Plouffe videos. She admits the focus was to "make" the press write what Plouffe said on a video as opposed to letting Plouffe do an interview.

Effective? Obviously. Obama was elected.

Ethical? Hardly. It clearly shows a campaign that wasn't comfortable with itself or its message.

You would think that people within the media establishments would actually take offense to all of this, since Dunn is clearly saying that they were played.

But alas, the sense of shame within such outlets was extinguished long ago. Odds are good they wouldn't even recognize it if it bit them on their collective butts.

If there are any MSM journalists who have the ability to feel shame, they should watch this video.



This is where it gets really good. Keep in mind the whole notion that the Obama campaign wanted to control what the media reported by not responding to questions or granting interviews. Based on Anita Dunn's own words in the video above, the campaign wanted the media to be reactive while the campaign was continually on offense.

Enter Glenn Beck's "red phone", which was installed on his set the day after Anita Dunn told CNN that Fox News was an arm of the Republican Party.

This clip will quickly give you the answer to the question of whether the Obama campaign strategy with the media is effective as a White House strategy.

Dunn's love for Mao's philosophical guidance notwithstanding, Glenn Beck is embarassing her relentlessly, the White House by extension, and rightfully so.



h/t to HOPE FOR AMERICA

VIDEO: SHOCKING! BECK EXPOSES ANITA DUNN

Anita Dunn, the White House Communications Director charged by Obama to go after the Fox News Channel and whose words on CNN earlier this week prompted Glenn Beck to install the Red phone on his set. While it has been humorous watching Beck totally shred Dunn and the Obama White House and then asking her to call the red phone that continues to remain silent, the video he played today is not humorous at all but it IS important.

Anita Dunn speaking to High School students on June 5th. Take note of the cross to her left as she informs the audience that China's Mao Tse Dung is her philosophical hero.



Here's the video that inserted Dunn into the latest fracas between the White House and the Constitution.



h/t to BREITBART

BECK ON OFFENSE WITH THE RED PHONE

White House mouthpiece Anita Dunn is looking more and more foolish by the day and Glenn Beck, go figure, is responsible. I don't know who came up with the Red Phone idea but it is working brilliantly.

Beck has a red phone on his set every day and tells the audience that the White House is the only entity with the phone number. He asks questions, puts forth theories, and relays facts about the Obama administration that are incredibly damning. He then points to the phone and asks when Anita is going to call.

The visual imagery communicates a powerful message - specifically, the longer the red phone doesn't ring, the longer it looks like Beck's points are vindicating him as the White House looks more and more foolish.

Michelle Malkin has an EXCELLENT PIECE on the White House decision to go after Beck.

VIDEO: GLENN BECK ON WHITE HOUSE WAR ON FOX

Best part? Your call. There are too many really GOOD parts to pick the best one. Using a sharpie to identify where the enemy of the White House is? Holding the map down with a jar of M&M's and a coffee cup with a U.S. flag on it? A border fence around Manhattan? Perhaps it was the toy tanks or maybe the toy air force jet he refrained from using to illustrate his point after giving it a second thought.

Whatever you choose, just know that as you are laughing Barack Obama and Anita Dunn are seething.



h/t to DISCOVER THE NETWORKS

VIDEO: NEW WHITE HOUSE MOUTHPIECE WHINES ABOUT FOX

This role used to be played by Linda Douglass, who has been an unequivocal disaster as a spinmeister for the Obama Administration. The fact that Anita Dunn is actually doing no better (perhaps worse) than Douglass, might provide fuel to the argument that the problem is not with people like Douglass or Dunn but with the president whose case they're tasked with making.

There is a whiney tone to Anita Dunn, for sure but perhaps she wouldn't be needed if Obama would actually respond to the very legitimate questions posed by talk radio, conservative blogs, and people like Glenn Beck instead of ignoring them.

I find it interesting that CNN has been airing panels and interviews in which it serves as the neutral bystander when the Fox News Channel is the topic. I guess if you're not going to carry programming that challenges the president, the next best thing is to talk about the network that does.



h/t to HOT AIR