AUDIO: COMMUNISM EXPLAINED IN 20 SECONDS

During Ed Schultz's December 15th radio show, his producer James Holm was talking on the air about Obama's meeting with the top CEO's in the country. Holm turned his attention to how much money those CEO's were sitting on. The amount totaled $1.9 Trillion according to him. Holm was disgusted by the fact that those CEO's weren't giving up that money and suggested that people who agree with him should 'put a gun to their head' as a remedy.

CLICK HERE for the audio.

Aside from the incendiary rhetoric, Holm's paradigm is disturbingly fascinating. The reason those CEO's have $1.9 Trillion is because they earned it. The reason our government is in hock to the tune of $14 Trillion is because it DIDN'T and then proceeded to mismanage it. Holm is literally advocating the confiscation of wealth from those who create more of it and giving it to those who squander it. How can a mind be so twisted that it views such a notion as rational?

h/t to NewsBusters

AUDIO: LIBERAL ED SCHULTZ ADVOCATES LAW-BREAKING IN MASSACHUSETTS

As I watched this, I was struck by the audacity of grope, as in groping for anything - even if illegal - in order to protect Teddy's seat. This clip of Ed Schultz epitomizes what's wrong with the left - at its very essence. This is vintage ends-justify-the-means-Alinsky-style tactics. Schultz is in support of breaking the law in order to guarantee his brand of justice. How is this any different than blaming right wing talk show hosts for the actions of nut jobs? If people who listen to Schultz actually take his advice, is Schultz responsible - using the left's standard of course?

This is clearly a sign that Coakley is in serious trouble. When one of the left's most prominent talking heads advocates law-breaking, we have a problem.

Yet again, another instance in which Attorney General Coakley is silent in the face of law-breaking / injustice.

Vigilantism or subliminal robo-call?



h/t to NB

VIDEO: ED SCHULTZ PREDICTIONS ON STIMULUS

I found this exchange while looking for the latest Ben Nelson ad. It was posted shortly after the Stimulus package was signed into law back in February. Larry King has both Ben Stein and Ed Schultz on his program to talk about what needs to be done to rejuvenate the ailing economy.

Far left progressive Schultz is shamed with his own words more than once in hindsight. In part 1, go to the 1:15 and 3:15 marks. At 3:45, he says, "This plan (stimulus) is going to work. It's just a matter of time."

Time's up, Ed.



In part 2, fast forward to the 1:19 mark as Ed says Obama isn't for bailouts and doesn't want to do this. And lastly, the 2:10 mark offers a gem too. Schultz, in defending stimulus, alludes to the need for health care reform. You'd think that after he was proven wrong on the Stimulus, he might have less credibility or even re-examine his paradigms. But alas, full steam ahead with healthcare these days, right Ed?



Here is one of the posts on YouTube from lv3ddip, an obvious abject liberal. I'd love to know his/her take now.

2:29 Sir, Sir, we have lost something like 7 trillon dollars of the savings of americans since Mr. Obama won the election...
The money is not out yet, and this clown says the money is lost?
Why the conservatives use comedians as their spoke persons? like this fart an the oxycontin addict.
By Stabilizing the financial system, Is he proposing to keep bailing out Wall Street?
Sir, Sir, Shut the f*** up!!!

Good job, big Ed!

Geesh

VIDEO: ED SCHULTZ SAYS REPUBLICANS = JANE FONDA

Where does one begin? Seriously. Whack job liberal Ed Schultz actually blames the Republicans for undermining Obama's effort to land the Olympic Games for Chicago and compares their doing so to what Jane Fonda did in Vietnam. I wonder how that comparison makes Vietnam veterans feel. Doesn't Schultz diminish their sacrifice by comparing the two?

And I wonder how Hanoi Jane feels about being thrown under the leftwing bus and turned into red meat for leftwing buzzards.

All that aside, this is a quintessential example of how badly the left hates losing, no matter what sport they're playing. They are utterly incapable of looking within and taking stock of themselves or their agenda. Hey Ed, maybe it was the fact that Chicago is the 2nd most corrupt city in America.

One thing I didn't hear Ed bring up was a report by a Danish newspaper, BERLINGSKE, which puts the blame squarely where it belongs - on Obama himself.

The explanations are many. The former Danish IOC member Kai Holm says to Berlingske that he believes that it is due to disrespect. Professor of sport history at the University of Copenhagen Hans Bonde suggests presidential arrival at the last minute and neglected personal lubricant of IOCs members.

At Chicago kicked out so early shows to me that Barack Obama does not understand the psychology of the IOC, said Hans Bonde.

There you have it. Straight from the mouth of a former IOC member. I don't know what on earth makes him think he's qualified to say such things. Doesn't he know that it's the Republicans' fault?

Expressing this view even further is none other than Congressman from Chicago, Jan Schakowsky (at the end of the clip), who actually points to Rush Limbaugh as the reason for Obama's failure.

Utterly shameless. CLICK HERE for the video.

Video via NEWSBUSTERS

h/t to GP for the Danish newspaper link.