DID 'WHITE HOUSE INSIDER' TAKE A CREDIBILITY HIT?

The alleged 'White House Insider,' who has been talking to anonymous blogger Ulsterman has maintained quite steadfastly that Pelosi would not stay on as the Democrat leader, though he / she DID predict Pelosi would not stay on as Speaker. As we all learned this week, Pelosi will remain the leader of the Democrat minority. Ulsterman posted another interview with WHI that took place prior to it becoming finalized that Pelosi would be minority leader.

WHI did allow him/herself some wiggle room though. While virtually certain that Pelosi would step down, WHI did discuss what it would mean if she did stay on; the conclusion was it wouldn't be good for the Democrat party but more important, according to WHI, it would mean that she cut a deal with the administration not to leak incredibly damaging information about Obama in exchange for retaining her leadership role.

Via Ulsterman:

Ulsterman: But if Pelosi keeps her leadership position, and it looks like she will —

Insider: I wouldn’t bank on that just yet – we got more and more people telling her to step the -expletive- down. Stand aside. Don’t be surprised to be surprised on that. I said she was done as Speaker, and I was right on that. I said she-she didn’t have the support to be party leader and I still stand by that. Still standin’!

Ulsterman: What if she does stay on as Minority Leader? Any effect on the scandal? Investigations? The Obama White House?

Insider: The number one impact is on the Democratic Party – and it would be a terrible-terrible thing for us. It’s inconceivable. Do you get that? Keep in place the same damn party leadership that cost us to lose 60 odd seats in the House? Why in the hell would we do that? Why? There is just no damn way the party is that stupid. No. Cannot be.

Ulsterman: What other impacts? Complications?

Insider: Of Pelosi staying on as party leader? Plenty. For one, it makes me question myself – my information, and that would make me very-very nervous. I don’t like to receive surprises. Like to give them. Don’t like to get them. That would be a nasty little surprise come my way.

Ulsterman then presses WHI for more clarity on why it would be such a big deal if Pelosi were to remain as minority leader..

Insider: (Hands cover face – then looks back at me.) Ok…ok, here…here is – I strongly suspect Nancy Pelosi has certain information, or parts of information, that-that would be essential to helping certain investigations against the White House. Investigations that could lead all the way to the top. It was my understanding that Pelosi had decided to let this information be known to others, say members of a committee, in her…absence. She would be gone, living the good life out there in California, not part of the investigations, not the cause of the disclosure, you know, that kind of scenario – though I think she has let some stuff get out there already as a way of telling the White House to back the -expletive- off. But by laying back on all of it, she would have necessary separation from it all. Do you understand?

Sound credible?

Keep watching Robert Gibbs. Remember, WHI said he would be leaving soon and the clock is ticking. If Gibbs doesn't go soon, WHI could start losing readers.

Read it all.

MSNBC'S ED SCHULTZ GOES AFTER JAY ROCKEFELLER

I guess we saw this one coming. After far left West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller (D) was caught on video advocating that Fox News and MSNBC both get shut down, far left liberal Ed Schultz made the senator the subject of his 'Psycho talk' segment on his MSNBC show. Schultz appeared apoplectic over the motive of Rockefeller to say such things and cited several examples of how MSNBC actually helped the cause of Rockefeller.

What's amazing is how blind Schultz seems to be to what Rockefeller is doing. It isn't about MSNBC; it's about Fox. Rockefeller would gladly throw MSNBC under the bus if it meant getting rid of Fox. By doing so, he can make himself appear non-partisan on the issue.

The reality is that the Tea Party movement coupled with shows like Beck and Hannity on Fox have Rockefeller scared and if they can be neutered by pulling the plug on a network nobody watches, he'd gladly do it. Apparently, Schultz doesn't understand that.



h/t HapBlog

LATEST FROM 'WHITE HOUSE INSIDER' - OTHERS ARE TALKING

It looks like Ulsterman will be feeding us another interview with the alleged 'White House Insider.' Part One has just come out and the sense one gets from it is that Ulsterman may be getting a little spooked by the gravity of the situation he's helped to create. The Insider does what he can to reassure him that the more people who talk, the safer Ulsterman will be. These interviews really do read like a drama series. Examples of things adding credibility to this Insider are recent comments by Joe Scarborough and now James Carville.

Before reading the interview, check out this VIDEO of Carville mocking Obama's manhood compared to that of Hillary. CLICK HERE to see what Scarborough had to say about Obama last week.

Via Ulsterman:

Insider: Hey, it’s not just me. There’s a whole mess of us pissed over what this White House has done to the party. So many good Democrats have been destroyed. What is left in the party. Nancy -expletive- Pelosi? Charlie -expletive- Rangle? Barney -expletive- Frank? Harry -expletive- Reid? No-no-no-no…there’s gonna be some new blood come into our party. The Democrats will rise up from this mess and be stronger for it. But you gotta hang tough kid – don’t back down now. Don’t lose your stomach. The one’s who don’t believe the information I’ve given you CHOOSE not to believe it. They refuse to. They don’t want to. They can’t admit the mistake that is Barack Obama. Hell, I wouldn’t want to either. If I hadn’t seen it, if I didn’t have people telling me every week how the man couldn’t find his own ass with a bell on it, I would calling you out as a liar as well. But that’s not where we are at now, right?

Ulsterman: No…

Insider: No it is not. I am not sure you fully appreciate the size and scope of what you are involved with here. It’s far greater than some angry Obama supporters out there calling you names, or making threats. If this breaks the way I think it will break, you are playing a part in history. I’m talking real -expletive- history. If that sounds beyond your own little reality, that’s because it is, or at least it was. But that reality doesn’t exist for you anymore. You started this with me, and you gotta see it through. More information is coming. More events are coming down the line. Have I given you anything that has not been proven right on? I may not have gotten the exact timing right in all of this, but I got you most the details, right?

Two things that raise flags regarding the claims of the Insider. One is that while he didn't say it was impossible for Pelosi to stay on as the Democrat leader in the House, he was close to adamant that it wouldn't happen. The other thing he has predicted is that Robert Gibbs would be out very soon - that hasn't happened.

Nonetheless, other things make these interviews very interesting. Speaking of Pelosi, this part one interview ends with a teaser about something coming out of her office in part two.

Read it all.